Industry news

  • 12 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The BT eShop service will include secure online payment processing tools from Sage Pay, the UK’s largest independent Internet Payment Service Provider, to help businesses quickly set-up a secure online store and reduce the risk of fraud across all of their online transactions.

    BT eShop provides a comprehensive package to enable businesses to quickly start selling products and services from their own web site without the need for software installation or any technical knowledge. It includes functionality to manage all of the back office functions e.g. customer orders, warehouse management, multi-language support, shipping and payment methods with a full range of marketing tools.

    “Having a strong online retail presence is forming a big part of many businesses armoury for fighting the downturn,” said Jerry Thompson, Director Business Products and Online, BT Business. “There is a real need for a service that simplifies ecommerce and removes the administrative complexities of online payment processing for small businesses in particular. The launch of BT eShop with Sage Pay does exactly this, helping companies securely pocket their online riches”.

  • 12 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    We all know that outsourcing is being considered more than ever by businesses who are desperately trying to cut back on expenditure in what has become a very unforgiving economy and employment market. In particular many call centres are now entertaining the notion of outsourcing some of their business practices, especially their call overflows, in order to significantly reduce their outgoings. And it goes without saying that outsourcing has numerous advantages that can make it an attractive proposition to contact centres. This week Call Centre and Customer Management outlined these advantages as; improving quality of service, reducing capital costs, reducing operational costs, and learning new skill sets. Now I know that you are reading this and thinking ‘why is the Round-Up telling us about the benefits of outsourcing – its like teaching your grandmother to suck eggs’. Just stay with me on this…

    I am bringing this to your attention because it was also reported that recent concerns have surfaced over the quality of customer services in UK contact centres. According to the consumer programme Watchdog, the standard of customer service from contact centres is actually worsening. Consumers up and down the UK have reportedly been left frustrated by unresolved customer service interaction. According to the report from the BBC programme, of the 7,120 respondents of a customer satisfaction survey as many as three quarters revealed that they were of the opinion that the standard of customer service in the UK was in decline. Put two and two together what do you get? OUTSOURCING!

    sourcingfocus.com news also reported that outsourcing firms handling call volumes from Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) continue to remain competitive and profitable with successful initiatives to contain cost during the global economic downturn. According to a new Frost and Sullivan analysis, past perceptions of loss of control over customer interactions are diminishing as providers in this market deploy successful implementations, offer advanced services and publish customer success stories. Let’s hear it again – OUTSOURCE!

    I will now stop preaching from the outsourcing bible and focus on some of the contracts signed and reported on sourcingfocus.com this week.

    Telstra, Australia’s largest telecommunications provider has signed one of two contracts expanding applications services with EDS, an HP company. The five-year, US$140 million deal is one of the largest application management engagements signed this year in Australia.

    Also, CSC was successful in winning £31m worth of contracts from the UK Atomic Energy Authority and Civil Nuclear Police Authority. CSC, the IT services provider, has secured information technology outsourcing contracts with five UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) companies and the Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA). The six contracts, which each have a five-year term, have a total estimated value of £31 million.

    Please do click through to the sourcingfocus.com website to see what else has been happening in the world of outsourcing. I hope you enjoy the rest of your Friday and that you have positive experiences with what ever call centre customer service operator you are bound to converse with at one time or other.

  • 12 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    We all know that outsourcing is being considered more than ever by businesses who are desperately trying to cut back on expenditure in what has become a very unforgiving economy and employment market. In particular many call centres are now entertaining the notion of outsourcing some of their business practices, especially their call overflows, in order to significantly reduce their outgoings. And it goes without saying that outsourcing has numerous advantages that can make it an attractive proposition to contact centres. This week Call Centre and Customer Management outlined these advantages as; improving quality of service, reducing capital costs, reducing operational costs, and learning new skill sets. Now I know that you are reading this and thinking ‘why is the Round-Up telling us about the benefits of outsourcing – its like teaching your grandmother to suck eggs’. Just stay with me on this…

    I am bringing this to your attention because it was also reported that recent concerns have surfaced over the quality of customer services in UK contact centres. According to the consumer programme Watchdog, the standard of customer service from contact centres is actually worsening. Consumers up and down the UK have reportedly been left frustrated by unresolved customer service interaction. According to the report from the BBC programme, of the 7,120 respondents of a customer satisfaction survey as many as three quarters revealed that they were of the opinion that the standard of customer service in the UK was in decline. Put two and two together what do you get? OUTSOURCING!

    sourcingfocus.com news also reported that outsourcing firms handling call volumes from Europe, the Middle East and Africa (EMEA) continue to remain competitive and profitable with successful initiatives to contain cost during the global economic downturn. According to a new Frost and Sullivan analysis, past perceptions of loss of control over customer interactions are diminishing as providers in this market deploy successful implementations, offer advanced services and publish customer success stories. Let’s hear it again – OUTSOURCE!

    I will now stop preaching from the outsourcing bible and focus on some of the contracts signed and reported on sourcingfocus.com this week.

    Telstra, Australia’s largest telecommunications provider has signed one of two contracts expanding applications services with EDS, an HP company. The five-year, US$140 million deal is one of the largest application management engagements signed this year in Australia.

    Also, CSC was successful in winning £31m worth of contracts from the UK Atomic Energy Authority and Civil Nuclear Police Authority. CSC, the IT services provider, has secured information technology outsourcing contracts with five UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) companies and the Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA). The six contracts, which each have a five-year term, have a total estimated value of £31 million.

    Please do click through to the sourcingfocus.com website to see what else has been happening in the world of outsourcing. I hope you enjoy the rest of your Friday and that you have positive experiences with what ever call centre customer service operator you are bound to converse with at one time or other.

  • 12 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The Black Book of Outsourcing is revered and derided in equal quantity. The launch of the latest edition, the ‘State of the Outsourcing Industry’, last week was no different and brought with it news of trends both obvious and unexpected. Whether the report’s findings (compiled from an estimated body of 25,000 outsourcing end-users), provides a true bearing on the industry, is still a matter of argument. Either way, the report certainly provides some interesting points for discussion though.

    The first big revelation settled what has been a big source for debate over the last four months – the Satyam scandal. There has been much talk about the effects that the fallout has had on confidence in the industry. Most of this has focused on the fact that end-users will increasingly think twice when looking at Indian suppliers; or at least eye them with a more intense scrutiny than before. But the report shows that India has been quick to recover from any initial shocks with 81 percent of respondents having detected increased accountability in their Indian vendors since February 09. Likewise trust, transparency and other such complementary adjectives are attached to the stoic Indian vendors community.

    “The pure-plays have put a huge amount of time and effort into reassuring existing and prospective clients with regards to their own compliance and governance. This has worked well for the tier one players in India,” commented Steve Sutton, Vice President, manufacturing, retail and distribution for Capgemini.

    But it may not be the upstanding qualities of Indian outsourcing vendors that has bolstered confidence in the country. The economic downturn, of course achieved some major coverage in the report. For Mark Richards, CEO of expw: consulting, the downturn is one of the core reasons for the lack of tangible damage India-side.

    “One suspects that the strength in the Indian outsourcing market has less to do with buyer confidence and more to do with restricted buyer purse strings. The Satyam issue could have been a big blow to Indian providers and offshoring in general but the global recession means that in the end buyers are willing to live with the risk if it means they are still able to invest in key strategic projects,” commented Richards.

    However, the recession did not feature for the reasons most would expect. Rather than encouraging an expansion of existing and new deals, a more visible result has been a drive towards renegotiation of existing deals. 17 percent of respondents were shown to be in vendor re-evaluation and 89 percent of these were ‘outraged by three main vendor positions forced during tough times: -unwillingness to renegotiate rates, -unwillingness to provide sameshore options and -unwillingness to improve service levels.

    The importance of renegotiating terms was a key theme and 47 percent of respondents reported overwhelming satisfaction with outsourcers that have agreed to address the three key issues. Of course all end users would love a push-over vendor that bows to all its demands. But the report and industry sentiment suggests that end-users want the opportunity to be able to discuss pushing costs down or at least altering the terms of agreements. Re-working or instigating new deals to create more rapid ROI was an important theme. But vendors are quick to state that trying to get too much ROI out too rapidly could result in service detriments.

    “A successful outsourcing or offshoring programme should provide dramatic ROI but companies making the move to outsource or offshore should be realistic about the time to deliver that return. One is reminded of the old but very true adage: you can have it good, you can have it fast or you can have it cheap but never all three at once. Outsourcing Fast and Cheap rarely (if ever) delivers good results or ROI. Good and Fast outsourcing programmes are never cheap – both examples show the challenge to using outsourcing as the means for a quick ROI,” commented Richards.

    Nevertheless the report found that many end users are looking for rapid ROI and ‘fast and ready’ outsourcing deals. 90 percent of respondents said that a 180 day or less ROI time frame was receiving immediate budget approvals in their companies. This trend to quick return has seen growth in the quick-win areas of procurement and accounts receivable but also in the slower-burn areas of payroll and HR benefits.

    Other reasons for the expectation and interest in fast ROI came from the ITO arena and the word on everyone’s lips: cloud computing and SaaS. 82 percent of ‘large market clients’, according to the report, were actively evalutating cloud and SaaS for their US$1Bn+ annual revenue companies. It seems certain that cloud and SaaS is to become a booming business. But whether traditional outsourcers are the natural providers of such services remains to be seen.

    “Cloud computing is not the death of offshoring/outsourcing but rather a new channel for companies making sourcing decision and it fills an important gap in the traditional options which all take much longer to implement and require much greater investments,” commented Richards.

    So outsourcing vendors may find cloud services a natural extension of their existing repertoire. But it is clear there is still much work to be done by many before consistent integrated services can be offered. Stuart Okin, MD of Comsec Consulting UK, believes cloud becoming mainstream is still some way off.

    “Cloud computing will revolutionise outsourcing, although it will take at least 10 years to become mainstream within larger enterprises. Although the savings are potentially huge, the challenges around business continuity, security and privacy are difficult to overcome. From an IT perspective, there are a number of emerging standards to help enterprises put in place redundancy, however, the game changer will be when a number of trusted brands come together to offer a combination of programmable environments with storage and processing services such as those being offered by Amazon and the traditional service providers,” stated Okin.

    As usual, the black book offers vendors and end users a lot of food for thought. It seems that 2009-2010 will be the making and breaking of many vendors. In the battle to retain clients, it seems that competitive contracts, appropriate ROI and investment in cloud computing will be key. One thing is clear though; the opportunities are still out there for vendors and buyers alike, even if they look a little different from before.

    For more things to think about, sourcingfocus.com readers can order the report here:

    http://www.theblackbookofoutsourcing.com/

  • 12 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    A few weeks back, I wrote about how, even in today's volatile economy, remarkably few outsourcing customers consider the implications of foreign exchange rates in their negotiations with offshore providers.

    Since then, outsourcing advisory firm Pace Harmon has released a report on the subject, "Offshoring - Why Foreign Exchange Matters and What to Do About It."

    In the report, Pace Harmon partner David Rutchik contends that, while it is difficult to completely remove the currency risks associated with offshore service, companies that "side-step" currency discussions miss out on significant potential savings.

    It seems to me that getting educated on this issue should be top priority for any organisation considering offshoring in 2009. As Pace Harmon's report confirms, the fact that many haven't done so yet is largely down to a lack of familiarity or comfort with the subject.

    The report, however, provides some interesting insights into why they should get that fixed - and quickly. For a start, offshore providers typically deliver services from emerging market locations and pay their resources in local currency. Because of recent market fluctuations, many providers' costs have decreased substantially, resulting in a financial windfall for them that could potentially be passed along, or at least shared, with the customer - but, more often than not, isn't.

    Pace Harmon's report recommends that companies consider five currency deal structures to yield the best possible financial results:

    1. Pay in US dollars [or your local currency] tied to the specific local currency;

    2. Arrange for fixed payment in US dollars [or your local currency];

    3. Agree to band currency changes to a certain percentage in either direction;

    4. Take a hybrid approach of averaging past exchange rates and apply local currency fluctuation to the prospective period; and

    5. Engage in hedging.

    The report provides a lot of useful detail on how outsourcing customers can put these principles into practice. It could be well worth a look.

  • 11 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    The Capita Group Plc is acquiring Carillion IT Services Ltd for £36 million.

    Carillion IT Services (CITS) currently offers organisations the full ICT lifecycle, ranging from business analysis through to a fully managed service.

    Paul Pindar, Chief Executive of the Capita Group Plc, commented, 'The acquisition of CITS will significantly enhance and expand Capita's position in the IT services market. As well as increasing the scale of Capita's IT Services operations, CITS has a number of key customers and expertise in a range of areas that complement and support Capita's existing capabilities. There will be significant operational and cost synergies from the bringing together of CITS and Capita IT Services. CITS also has a strong presence in Scotland which will support our aim to continue building our operations and offering in Scotland.'

  • 11 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    Slasscom, the Sri Lankan IT and BPO Industry Chamber is launching into the UK marketplace with the express aim of promoting Sri Lanka as the next big global sourcing destination and a key competitor to emerging destinations. By partnering with the Sri Lankan Government, SLASSCOM aims to attract new investments into Sri Lanka’s IT and BPO industry and predicts this to become the highest export earner for Sri Lanka. sourcingfocus.com talks to Madu Ratnayake, Director & General Secretary of Slasscom to find out more.

    Slasscom podcast

  • 10 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    CSC, the IT services provider, has secured information technology outsourcing contracts with five UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) companies and the Civil Nuclear Police Authority (CNPA). The six contracts, which each have a five-year term, have a total estimated value of £31 million.

    Under the terms of the contracts, CSC will provide the UKAEA companies and the CNPA with a full range of infrastructure services including desktop, help desk and network support, applications management and database administration. UKAEA companies serviced under the separate contracts are Dounreay Site Restoration Ltd., Research Sites Restoration Ltd., UKAEA Culham, UKAEA Ltd. and UKAEA itself. As part of the arrangement, UKAEA will transfer its in-house IT team to CSC.

    CSC will deliver the contracts through its Civil Nuclear Centre of Excellence in Westlakes, Cumbria, UK, which specialises in IT capabilities for nuclear power clients.

    "CSC is pleased to be working with the UKAEA group of companies and the CNPA," said Nick Wilson, president of CSC's operations in the UK, Nordics, Middle East and Africa. "These contracts build on our position as the UK's number one supplier of IT services and solutions to the UK civil nuclear industry. We now work for 14 different UK organizations operating in this evolving sector, as well as many others around the world."

    "This is an excellent outcome to the constructive, competitive dialogue between ourselves and CSC," said UKAEA Chief Executive Officer Norman Harrison. "It provides a sound basis for future IT services to a changing UKAEA and retains the skills and expertise of our experienced team while giving them opportunities to develop in a wider commercial environment."

  • 10 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    If one looks at the two Mandarin symbols used for ‘crisis’, you can see that they actually represent two different words and concepts – the first one means ‘threat’, while the second, rather revealingly, is ‘opportunity’.

    During the last 6 months, I have attended numerous events where CIOs were at least present if not presenting, and on each occasion, I have seen huddles of people in corners, all discussing the same issues:

    Why doesn’t the business understand the value we bring to them?

    How can I renegotiate my contracts to save money and keep my supplier costs as low as possible?

    By how much do I need to trim my workforce to meet budget targets?

    How long can I delay my technology refresh without risking the business’ efficiency?

    What training courses can I cancel?

    I’m worried about surviving today, never mind the future!

    But then there’s a refreshing, albeit far smaller, smiling group of people discussing a very different topic – the opportunities the current crisis will provide them and how, as CIOs, this is the perfect time to demonstrate the value they bring to the business.

    The question this makes me ask is: Why is there a difference?

    Surely a truly professional CIO would have all the requisite measures in place? There should be no need to wait for a crisis to make sure their activity is fully aligned with the business and that they have strong stakeholder engagement from all the key departments of the organisation.

    Shouldn’t they already provide business value through technology, rather than just the latest technology, and negotiating contracts that are of best value and sustainable?

    Yes, the business may have changed. Maybe it demands different priorities and objectives from the CIO, but everything else should be happening whether or not there is a crisis. The CIO should be future-proofing in anticipation of the worst case scenarios, whether the business is going through one at the time or not. The only deviation from this is reacting differently to ever-changing business demands – everything else should already be working properly.

    Perhaps for those people who see the crisis as a threat, the risk is actually to their own position.

  • 10 Jun 2009 12:00 AM | Anonymous

    So, you have this process that you want to outsource or you may already have a supplier beavering away for you behind the scenes, it is a recession and you are thinking to yourself ‘I should get what I want for a hell of a lot cheaper’. With that in mind you rub your hands together, step into the meeting room and so follows the loud noises associated with a supplier being hammered down on price.

    Now some may think that this is just the way the cookie crumbles during times of economic turbulence, where the ‘cost is king’ approach to outsourcing is rife. This may be the case, but end users need to be wary of archaic negotiating. A spur of the moment decision to drum down outsourcing prices without any consideration of the overall outsourcing relationship could be cause for regret further down the road.

    sourcingfocus.com has set out on a quest to find out the best ways users can get the maximum from their supplier whilst ensuring the people doing the work have enough incentive there to do it properly.

    Price is always a delicate matter that needs careful debate from all parties in an outsourcing deal. End users need to ensure that value for money is being achieved and suppliers have to see a good incentive for delivering excellent service. If the balance tips excessively in one direction then both parties will find that the relationship turns sour and ultimately fails.

    Martyn Hart, Chairman of the National Outsourcing Association, offers an example of the repercussions associated with a blinkered view point, “By focusing solely on reducing costs rather than maximising the potential benefits the supplier can provide, end users are putting additional pressure on suppliers to lower their bid to an unprofitable level in order to secure the business.

    However, it should come as no surprise that suppliers attempt to claw back their initial losses as time goes on. No supplier wants to sell like this, but competitive bidding processes such as these leaves them with no alternative. Suppliers will use constant change requests and other variations to extract extra revenues from the contract without the scrutiny of a procurement process or comparative pricing mechanism.”

    With this in mind, how can end users look to maximise an outsourcing deal without putting service delivery and relationship management at risk? William Benn, Partner & Head of Public Sector at Alsbridge, an outsourcing advisory firm, believes that there are steps end users can take to maximise their outsourcing arrangements,

    “Price is definitely an aspect of the outsourcing arrangement that should be discussed. However, hammering suppliers down on price will result in the supplier looking for retribution and making back the costs further down the line. Clients should look to sit down with the suppliers and talk about the issue of cost as a joint problem solving experience.”

    Mr Benn does make the point that there needs to be a healthy relationship with the supplier in order for the negotiations to be worthwhile. If there are any issues outstanding with the supplier then these need to be addressed and resolved first, there is no point in looking for price reductions for a service that you are not happy with anyway.

    The end user does not have to adopt the single approach that they want the same service for less. Mr Benn points out that there is a certain amount of give and take that can be done in order to achieve mutually beneficial results, for example clients could look to get less active processes put on hold and the resources either reallocated to more core services or the price of the overall service to reduce for a period of time.

    Clients could also negotiate a current saving whilst handing over more work to the supplier further down the line or extending an original contract. If the outsourcing arrangement is going well then why not look to extend it in order to get more savings now?

    Srikanth Iyengar, Global Head of Business Development for Strategic Global Sourcing at Infosys, believes that suppliers are there to help end users achieve their cost savings, “Suppliers would not want to damage their reputation by reducing service to clients looking to make savings. There needs to be a partnership approach to achieving the cost savings needed, expanding an original commitment will allow suppliers to look at offering cost reductions now.”

    Offering incentives to a supplier could also reap immediate cost savings. Having lucrative bonuses available to suppliers who exceed long term SLAs could result in the reduction of day to day cost which may free up initial capital for end users whilst simultaneously ensuring that suppliers have sufficient incentive to carry out the work effectively.

    According to William Benn it is a buyers market right now, however, users need to ensure that they are following the traditional best practices when engaging in new outsourcing deals. Those looking to outsource for the first time may be better off if they seek external experience in the form of advisories firms or consultancies, not just as a way of internally assessing whether outsourcing is right for them, but these advisory firms will have an idea of which suppliers in the market place are prepared to negotiate in on price.

    Clear honest communication should be the first port of call for any end user looking to negotiate on price. By being open with suppliers and actually working out a mutually beneficial strategy, end users will find that they get the best from their outsourcing deal. Taking a hard nosed stance, not negotiating and forcing a supplier into a corner will result in a backlash that could involve higher costs in the long run and, possibly worse, a diminished service.

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software