Outsourcing end-users are looking increasingly immature in the way they manage their contracts. What justification do I have for this sweeping and stinging appraisal? The new PA Consulting report ‘Outsourcing – what lies beneath’ - that’s what. A quality report, from a respected consultancy, based on reasoned, systematic research – who can argue with that?

Some of the findings are stark and provide a real wake up call for those that have been resting on their laurels where outsourcing deals are concerned. The first and most surprising in the current financial climate, is that 31 percent of respondents were unaware what percentage of their outsourcing spend went into managing suppliers.

The lack of knowledge on outsourcing management spend was also mirrored when respondents were asked about the levels of outsourcing maturity. Only 16 percent assessed themselves as having a mature governance model for their outsourced services. The report is clear, although many companies are now old-hands at outsourcing, the way deals are managed and the amount of focus placed on the management process has not massively progressed.

These stats are worrying when looked at alongside an ongoing industry trend. Multi-sourcing, where multiple suppliers serve different parts of an end-user’s requirements, has been the talk of the industry over the last few years. Gartner’s ongoing research into outsourcing ‘megadeals’ continues to see the overall interest in multisourcing growing. But PA Consulting’s report questions whether end-users know the risks involved in splitting outsourced processes into continually smaller parts.

Jonathan Cooper-Bagnall, Member of PA Consulting’s Management Group, commented, “We are seeing more and more that multisourcing is a developing trend, making integration of services all the more crucial. However, many ‘tier one’ organisations have already had to invest heavily in teams of people to fulfil the integration role, simply through lack of an early identification of the need for service integration.”

There is a clear clash between the industry’s drive towards multisourcing and its overall understanding of what the concept entails. But the somewhat blind trend towards multisourcing is set to continue with 28 percent of respondents in PA’s report planning to split their outsourcing by vertical service over the next five years.

So what is driving this lemming-esque trend? Smaller vendors surely have to take on some of the culpability, after all the larger vendors will continue to push their full managed-service offerings. Multisourcing is attractive for smaller vendors who are generally high in service expertise but lack in-house management resources.

However, by and large, the biggest thing prompting end-users to explore outsourcing are the prospects of cutting costs. 75 percent of respondents said they would use competitive multi-sourcing in an attempt to drive down cost. The aim being to ‘improve competition, maximise supplier skills and expertise and, critically, drive down costs by achieving better contract pricing’.

But this is where the problem lies. A large proportion of respondents were largely unaware of what goes into the management of multiple contracts and consequently are going to have a steep learning curve.

Graham Beck, Senior Sourcing Advisor for PA Consulting, commented, “In a single-source relationship where gaps in integration occur, the supplier will usually step up to the mark. But in a multi-sourced set-up where there are interface problems, no supplier is likely to take up the slack.”

sourcingfocus.com met with the PA Consulting team at the report launch to discuss the issues. The feeling was not that multisourcing is an inherently flawed concept, but that users need to be fully appraised of what’s involved before doing anything. The management extras that full-service suppliers provide, both paid and unpaid, are not easily visible from the outside. If an unprepared end-user decides to jump headlong into multisourcing, these hidden management activities could become all too visible, all too quickly.